About the project

TutorBot is an academic research platform for structured AI tutoring

The project was developed at Rochester Institute of Technology to study how AI support can be integrated into coursework without giving up educator control or reducing learning to answer generation.

AI Foundry Logo

AI Foundry

Rochester Institute of Technology

TutorBot is presented here as a university-sponsored project with explicit educational and research boundaries.

Origin and motivation

TutorBot grew out of conversations at Rochester Institute of Technology about how large language models were already affecting student study habits and course work.

Rather than treating AI use as either inevitable progress or a problem to ignore, the project asks a more practical question: what happens when instructors can shape the tutoring context, boundaries, and pedagogical goals directly?

That framing makes TutorBot both a course-support platform and a vehicle for educational research on structured AI use.

The educational challenge

What AI tools can already offer

  • AI tools are available when students need help, including outside office hours.
  • Students often find it easier to expose confusion in a non-judgmental conversational setting.
  • Large language models can respond well to foundational course questions across many disciplines.

Why structure and oversight still matter

  • General-purpose assistants often optimize for giving answers rather than supporting learning progress.
  • They do not inherently understand assignment rules, course intent, or instructor priorities.
  • Unstructured use makes it difficult for faculty and researchers to understand what kinds of help students are actually receiving.

Project principles and guardrails

Educator control comes first

Faculty define assistant behavior, assignment structure, and question context rather than accepting a generic tutoring experience.

Assignment context matters

TutorBot is designed around actual course questions, expected concepts, and common mistakes so support is grounded in the learning task.

Research framing stays visible

The platform is intended to support study of AI-assisted learning, not just broaden access to another chatbot.

The system does not replace grading

TutorBot does not exist to automate course assessment or collapse instructional judgment into model output.

What the platform includes today

Current TutorBot workflows center on course-specific assignments, faculty-configured assistants, and role-aware experiences for students, faculty, and administrators.

Faculty-configured assistant types

Courses can use assistants for guided tutoring, feedback, and other instructor-defined educational roles.

Rich question context

Faculty author question text, example answers, concepts, and misconceptions that shape how assistants respond.

Structured student workflows

Students encounter AI support through assignment sessions and other controlled workflows rather than only through a general chat entry point.

Conversation and usage review

Authorized users can review tutoring sessions and interaction patterns in ways that support oversight and research.

Pilot status and stewardship

TutorBot is in an active pilot phase. The current work focuses on refining course workflows, assistant behavior, and the public explanation of the project while keeping the academic framing explicit.

Developed through Rochester Institute of Technology and the AI Foundry.

Dr. Christopher Collison

Director, AI Hub and Initiatives; Jane King Harris Professor, School of Chemistry and Materials Science

Provides academic leadership for the project and its research framing within RIT.

cjcscha@rit.edu

Tom Fuller

Principal Lead, AI Foundry and TutorBot; Assistant Research Professor, School of Chemistry and Materials Science

Leads platform implementation, workflow design, and the translation of educational goals into product behavior.

tefsch@rit.edu

Continue exploring

The public pages are meant to explain what TutorBot is, why it exists, and how it is being piloted. Existing users can sign in directly, while faculty and academic partners can request access when participation is appropriate.